nathaniel payne / words

This isn’t the Des Moines logo you’re looking for

Down below, on the left is the new City of Des Moines logo. Right next to that is the old logo. The old logo definitely looks dated, and was desperately overdue for a makeover, having been designed by cavemen in the late paleolithic era (oftentimes referred to colloquially as “the 70’s”). The new logo looks better, but there are elements that do not speak to me at all.

My thoughts on the new logo parallel Mike Templeton‘s on many aspects. I love the smooth blue gradient on the arch. The font was an excellent choice; it has a very causal urban feel to it. The placement of “Des Moines” beneath the left foundation of the arch, with the right section sweeping down off canvas is a beautiful design element. The white silhouette of the city skyline with lighter blue gradients acting as a background is gorgeous. I personally would have moved the “City of” to be immediately above “Des Moines”, a bit off center, to pull the eye inward. As it stands, the “City of” just kind of dangles there, as though it’s waiting for someone to cut it off completely; like a hangnail. But overall, many of the design choices are excellent and work well for a city logo.

The problem is: this isn’t a logo for Des Moines.

Rider Way, Des Moines, Iowa - photo by bridgepix

Granted, it is technically the new City of Des Moines logo, but it probably shouldn’t be. This very simply looks like a logo design intended for another city. The most prominent element of the logo is the giant blue arch. Des Moines the city doesn’t have a giant arch design element; I don’t quite understand why Des Moines the logo does. Supposedly the element is meant to capture the essence of our new pedestrian bridges spanning I-235. While those bridges are definitely attractive, there’s only three (thanks @awesome_andrea), and they’re fairly recent integrations into Des Moines’ overall infrastructure. I don’t know that they define Des Moines enough to be such a prominent element in our logo. To me, it looks like we’re highlighting our giant arch, which doesn’t really exist.

Let’s see, who around us has a giant arch? Well, our neighbor to the south does. Maybe they would like to use our new logo design for themselves. As it stands, I’d rather see a new logo that actually shows what makes Des Moines unique. I don’t know exactly what that might be, but it has to be something better than a non-existant giant arch.

UPDATE: I just found the St. Louis logo. Dear god, is it even possible? We actually have a better St. Louis logo than St. Louis does.

Posted on August 19, 2008 by Nathaniel Payne in Creativity | Tagged des moines, graphic design, iowa, logo, marketing, reviews | 3 Comments

search

recent posts

  • On constant, incremental progression
  • Okay, so here’s the deal with 2015
  • It’s NaNoWriMo time again!
  • On the marking of milestones
  • Gamers should WANT more women in their games

archives

  • July 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • March 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • April 2013
  • December 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • November 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
Copyright © Nathaniel Payne / Words 2025. WordPress theme by Ryan Hellyer.